Next Up
Crystal PalaceCRY
vs
Newcastle UnitedNEW
Sun 12 Apr13:00

Newcastle won’t sign Mason Mount

Crippy CookeCrippy Cooke
Share
Newcastle won’t sign Mason Mount

Newcastle United don’t have a creative midfielder and have been reliant on their chances coming from the wide-men, so Eddie Howe could be on the hunt for a playmaker this summer.

Duncan Wright of The Sun says Chelsea midfielder Mason Mount is on their radar and has an uncertain future at Stamford Bridge due to Chelsea being under a transfer embargo.

The Blues aren’t permitted to hand the 23-year-old an improved contract  while Roman Abramovich remains the owner, so suitors could take advantage by handing Mount a significant payrise – he currently takes home £70k-per-week and has a £70m asking price.

Newcastle are being linked with the England international as they have the resources to blow any club out the water, but there’s no guarantee Mount would join them over Liverpool or Manchester City if offers came.

The Magpies are still at the beginning of their project and aren’t likely to consistently challenge for major honours for a number of years, so players might not pick them over Premier League giants just yet.

Howe has been ambitious in the transfer market signing Kieran Trippier and Bruno Guimaraes, but Mount might be out of reach. The 23-year-old has made 49 appearances in all competitions this season, scoring 12 goals with 15 assists.

Mount still has two years remaining on his deal at Chelsea too, so the Blues aren’t even obligated to cash in this summer.

In other news, journalists praise ‘quality’ Bruno Guimaraes for Newcastle v Liverpool

#TeamPGDPts
···
9
FulhamFUL
31-144
10
Brighton & Hove AlbionBHA
31+443
11
SunderlandSUN
31-443
12
Newcastle UnitedNEW
31-142
13
AFC BournemouthBOU
31-242
14
Crystal PalaceCRY
30-239
15
Leeds UnitedLEE
31-1133
···

Sports journalist who is an avid football fan, enjoys debunking transfer rumours, loves to write pieces on players out in the cold and takes a large amount of pride getting a predicted XI 100% correct.

View all articles →

Related